![Elodie Flenniau on Twitter: "Were we not supposed to try to reduce the comsuption of plastic? Might be why its £55 lol #fashion #trending #jeans # moto #topshop #plastic https://t.co/qGS25HuTc9" / Twitter Elodie Flenniau on Twitter: "Were we not supposed to try to reduce the comsuption of plastic? Might be why its £55 lol #fashion #trending #jeans # moto #topshop #plastic https://t.co/qGS25HuTc9" / Twitter](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C-HGtZ_XYAAsNS1.jpg:large)
Elodie Flenniau on Twitter: "Were we not supposed to try to reduce the comsuption of plastic? Might be why its £55 lol #fashion #trending #jeans # moto #topshop #plastic https://t.co/qGS25HuTc9" / Twitter
![Mia on Twitter: "Clear jeans? Defeating the whole object of jeans... @Topshop to far 😩 https://t.co/ZRezRB8kaz" / Twitter Mia on Twitter: "Clear jeans? Defeating the whole object of jeans... @Topshop to far 😩 https://t.co/ZRezRB8kaz" / Twitter](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C96wG7BUAAAdl91.jpg:large)
Mia on Twitter: "Clear jeans? Defeating the whole object of jeans... @Topshop to far 😩 https://t.co/ZRezRB8kaz" / Twitter
![Today In WTF Fashion: TopShop Sells Clear 'Jeans' While Nordstrom Charges $425 For 'Muddy' Ones – Consumerist Today In WTF Fashion: TopShop Sells Clear 'Jeans' While Nordstrom Charges $425 For 'Muddy' Ones – Consumerist](https://consumerist.com/consumermediallc.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/screen-shot-2017-04-25-at-12-36-17-pm.png)